Все жанры Все авторы
Cartesian scientific paradigm. Tutorial - Pavel Minakov, Vadim Shmal

Cartesian scientific paradigm. Tutorial

Страниц

45

Год

—

Книга "Descartes and the Philosophy of Subjectivity" исследует влияние кардинальных методов и мыслей Рене Декарта на философию субъективности. Авторы анализируют, как эти идеи исказили традиционное представление о человеке как субъекте, а также влияние этих теорий на последующих философов. Книга поднимает такие вопросы, как проблема познания, проблема свободы воли и роль субъективности в мышлении Декарта. Важное внимание уделяется изменению представлений о природном мире и революции в понимании отношений между людьми и окружающей средой. Авторы сравнивают статичное представление Декарта о природном мире с современными представлениями о его динамичности и изменчивости. Книга также исследует, как мысли Декарта о субъективности влияли на понимание свободы и рассматривает работы Спинозы, который аргументировал, что свобода существует, так как мы действуем под влиянием рациональных убеждений. Окончательное содержание книги может включать более широкий анализ других философов и их вносимого вклада в область философии субъективности.

Читать бесплатно онлайн Cartesian scientific paradigm. Tutorial - Pavel Minakov, Vadim Shmal

© Sergey Pavlov, 2021

© Vadim Shmal, 2021

© Pavel Minakov, 2021


ISBN 978-5-0055-6696-6

Создано в интеллектуальной издательской системе Ridero

Introduction

One of the reasons Descartes is called the father of modern philosophy is because he set the agenda for those philosophers who came after him. Over the centuries, many thinkers have tried to interpret Descartes’ methods for their own purposes. This influence continues today.

Some philosophical problems will be familiar to people – say, the problem of knowledge or the problem of free will. The key question, however, is how to present these problems in a radically different way from Descartes’s in order to accommodate a philosophy of subjectivity that goes beyond the traditional concept of man as a thing that can be known.

Much has been written about the problem of Descartes’ knowledge. But more is needed to explain the role of subjectivity in Descartes’ thinking and how it influenced later philosophers. But I feel that this will become even more important in the future as the scale of the relationship between humans and the natural world will expand. Today we are experiencing a revolution in our understanding of the relationship between humans and the environment.

Among other things, this revolution is based on the discovery that the «natural» world (which Descartes considered a static environment, shaped by God) is in fact a dynamic, changing in an increasingly complex way. From wildfires and the rise of agriculture to the introduction of agriculture into livestock and human industries, we are constantly changing the environment in countless ways.

Descartes’ model of the natural world implies that we are trapped in predetermined deterministic rules of the natural world. Today, many people believe that they have escaped from this control, and can chart their own course in the world, guided by reasons, feelings and memory.

Descartes’ views on the subjectivity of reason guided philosophers who tried to find the meaning of freedom. Spinoza argued that we are free to act, because reason compels us to do so. If we can do this, we are free. But Spinoza also said that since reason is the vehicle of free will, free will has a natural source – or at least a source that we can turn to. And Descartes’ own opinion that the feeling «I am» or what in Hegel’s philosophy is called «withdrawal» is essential for this understanding of freedom.

Thus, Descartes’s views on the subjectivity of reason inspired a wide range of thinkers. But they were also taken quite differently by philosophers who continue to hold Descartes’ views of man as a thing that can be known. One of them, the philosopher Abraham Kuyper, argued that «the sensible existence of a person is just a case of his awareness, conceived in his own consciousness, that he exists existentially». In other words, my being has a certain meaning, and I am happy to know that.

In fact, Kuyper believed that knowing that I existentially exist was critical to my freedom – and to all other people – because knowing my existence prompts me to act. According to his version of Descartes, the world is fixed and given; I do not just exist, but I can think and act freely. I do not just exist, but I know my existence and free will.

Вам может понравиться: