Dostoevsky, Berdyaev, and Shestov. Three Russian Apostles of Freedom - Daniel McNeill

Dostoevsky, Berdyaev, and Shestov. Three Russian Apostles of Freedom

Автор

Страниц

135

Год

2020

Dostoevsky, the renowned Russian writer, firmly clung to the essence of his own human experience, refusing to conform to societal norms and restrictions. In his profound work, "The Brothers Karamazov," he delved deep into the human soul, exposing its intricate nature and shedding light on the fundamental importance of freedom.

Lev Shestov, a philosopher influenced by Dostoevsky's ideas, unveiled a powerful concept. He emphasized that attempting to subject the human soul to external laws is equivalent to willingly relinquishing our right to explore its depths and embrace its entirety. Shestov's words serve as a poignant reminder that true understanding and acceptance reside in embracing the full spectrum of humanity.

Within the pages of "The Brothers Karamazov," Dostoevsky ventured to illustrate that even God Himself demands the existence of human liberty. This striking revelation transcends the traditional notions of religion and invites the reader to contemplate the profound relationship between divinity and humanity. Dostoevsky weaves together a tapestry that intertwines the nature of man with the unveiling of God, illustrating the inseparable connection between the two.

Nicholas Berdyaev, another influential thinker, recognized that genuine humanity not only reveals the true essence of man but also uncovers the divine. In his insightful writings, he echoes the sentiments expressed by Dostoevsky, highlighting the interplay between our own humanity and the revelation of God. Berdyaev's profound words reinforce the notion that true liberation lies in embracing the authentic path to freedom.

The collective wisdom of these three great thinkers illuminates a transcendental journey towards freedom. They urge us to cast aside preconceived notions, embrace the complexity of the human soul, and acknowledge the divine presence within. Through their thought-provoking insights, we are encouraged to embark on a profound exploration of our own existence, allowing us to tap into the limitless potential of the human spirit. Embracing this unique perspective, we can truly unlock the boundless opportunities that lie on the authentic path to freedom.

Читать бесплатно онлайн Dostoevsky, Berdyaev, and Shestov. Three Russian Apostles of Freedom - Daniel McNeill

Part One

Dostoevsky

1

Russia geographically is so huge that something inside a Russian feels without limit. No matter how strongly Russians are controlled politically, they still feel that something within them, some sense of themselves that arises freely in their souls, can never be controlled. The soul cries out that it should not be ruled by anything, neither by a power in the outside world nor by some power in the mind. At times something wonderful comes alive in the Russian soul, something infinitely gentle and unworldly. Even when such moments pass, Russians refuse to believe their souls are empty and worthless. This belief gives the soul the strength to endure anything coming at it from the outside world.

Western European values based on materialism and scientific rationality entered Russia in the 18th century. They did not fit smoothly with Russian customs. Tsar Peter the Great imported Italian and French artists and architects to build the city of Saint Petersburg using eighteenth-century technologies. The result was a strange artificial city placed on Russian soil as if from nowhere. Fyodor Dostoevsky, the nineteenth-century Russian novelist, wrote that the Tsar’s city, Saint Petersburg, is “the most abstract and intentional city on the whole terrestrial globe”. The idea that a city could be produced intentionally stuck in Dostoevsky’s mind. If a whole city resulted from a premeditated rational idea, what prevented people in an intentional city from acting intentionally? And if architects could create a city intentionally, why could not he, Dostoevsky, create a novel with a hero who acts only intentionally and refuses to act naturally like those around him?

Let’s follow his young intentional hero through the streets of Saint Petersburg in the 1860s. Where is the young man, Raskolnikov, going? He is on his way to visit a sixty-year-old woman, a pawnbroker. He has visited her before and pawned objects for money. He is dressed negligently and is in need of money. He lives in a very small room, has little means and is thin and poorly nourished. He enters the woman’s apartment and talks with her about how much money she will give him for a watch.

She gives him one rouble and fifteen kopecks but money this day is not his only object. Raskolnikov intends to experiment intentionally with reality rather than let reality experiment with him as do most people. He is going to test Western European rationalistic culture. Such culture exists inside him because he is perfectly capable as are other Petersburg students of acting rationally. It is in fact the easiest thing in the world to be rational and act rationally but something urges him to carry rationality to an extreme, to test how far rationality can go.

Where did Saint Petersburg come from? Why is Tzar Peter the Great’s “intentional” city here? Where is the spiritual freedom and cultural independence of the Russian past? Why are some people around him as he walks to the pawnbroker dressed in Western European style clothes? Don’t they see that they look odd compared to the way most people in Petersburg dress? He too when he dresses well is peculiar just like they. And all the socialist agitators in his neighborhood, don’t they realize that their ideas are unseemly, that their revolutionary desire to create some new world is illusory? Raskolnikov is going to find out if an action motivated by nothing at all except a rational intention born in his own mind and nowhere else can be authentic. Why should not a rational person, if he must live guided by his reason because he lives in a modern abstract and intentional city, not be allowed to do anything at all that can be conceived rationally? A rational being like young Raskolnikov might act rationally in order to do something that the masses of people think despicable, evil, insane, but could not a man superior to the masses prove his superiority by daring to do something of the sort? He might use his reason to the extreme to establish his superiority just as the rational Western European architects went to a rational extreme by constructing Peter the Great’s “intentional” city. If rationality is the final destiny of all humans, something they must adopt to conduct their lives whether they like it or not, if rationality is everything then everything must be able to be done rationally, and even an insane terrible act should not have an irrational result in a feeling of guilt or shame if it is done intentionally. Raskolnikov has been alone brooding and thinking in his small room for many days avoiding human contact. He visits the pawnbroker not just for money but also to examine the inside of her apartment. One idea dominates his being, the idea of slicing an axe into the skull of the old pawnbroker simply to prove to himself that he could carry out rationally any act no matter how terrible.